🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters praising your advice on expanding your business? Do recruiters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined an organized professional network test this week following viral posts indicated that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts are shown to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decline significantly.

The Method

• First, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with similar "assertive" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and clever, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after seven days, saying "Each day I continued, and results got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants experienced positive results. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "white" described a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by male and female users received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."